Round Rock considers stop on Austin-San Antonio rail

News

With lines in the works from Leander to Austin and Georgetown to San Antonio, passenger rail may soon become a very real alternative for travelers in Central Texas. But officials in Round Rock are not on board yet, and those in the rail district say the city needs to make a decision soon if it wants a stop along the Austin-San Antonio line.

While Capital Metro is preparing for rail from Leander to Austin this fall, the Austin-San Antonio Intermunicipal Commuter Rail District, or ASA, is working with communities along the IH 35 corridor to create what may be the longest stretch of commuter rail in the south, a 112-mile line from San Antonio to Georgetown. Ultimately, the railway may branch out farther, connecting to established lines across the country, but interim service in Central Texas could begin as early as 2011.

A seat at the table

ASA ridership studies estimate that 3.2 million people would use its rail by 2030, but without a decision from the city, Round Rock may be left without a station.

“We’re not planning on building a station there; we’re not going to even do any more studies there if they don’t indicate they want to join,” said Alison Schulze, ASA senior planner. “Now, we’re at the point where if you want a station, you need to be at the table; you need to buy into this, at least while we’re doing the planning.”Proposed stations for area commuter railroads

Supporters of the district believe that passenger rail would ease traffic congestion on IH 35 and prompt economic growth along the route, but some in Round Rock say the proposed station would offer no chance for growth to help cover the district’s hefty capital cost.

“Of course, there’s interest: our citizens are interested in the rail district, our council members are interested, but it’s got to be doable financially,” said David Bartels, public works planning and programs administrator. “The entire area is already developed, and for a rail station to really do well, it needs to have a high density of employers and residential.”

The district’s proposed station would be located in downtown Round Rock, just south of city hall. While the ASA district does not require costs to be collected by the city in any particular way, it does present a menu of options that have proven successful in other regions with rail.

One of the more common approaches for funding rail is tax increment financing, or TIF. The concept is that as property values rise around the newly created station, the city will see an increase in tax revenue. This increase would go to cover the cost of joining the district, but with downtown already developed, Bartels said there would be little chance to recoup the city’s investment.

Bartels said a more advantageous option for Round Rock may be a station in a less-developed area, such as farther north near University Boulevard. Open land for new properties and proximity to the hub of higher education campuses and hospitals would offer more potential for growth and a productive TIF district.

Schulze said the preliminary station location was selected with input from city staff, but that as the time for station construction approaches, the district would allow Round Rock to select a more pleasing piece of real estate or to build a second station elsewhere.

Mayor Alan McGraw said he believes the city will join the ASA district for planning within the next few months, but that a final decision about building a rail station will have to wait until the costs and benefits are weighed more carefully.

“The overall problem with rail is just the sheer magnitude of the cost you’re looking at,” he said. “Rail sounds good and rail can provide a useful service, but it also has to be compared to the cost of that service to see if it makes sense or to see if there are other ways to do it that make more sense.”

Round Rock could join the district for a yearly cost of $49,500 with no obligation to pay for construction costs when the time comes. Once construction begins, each member of the ASA district that still wishes to participate will split the estimated capital cost of $613 million. Other expenses would include operation and maintenance — $28 million a year during the startup period and $40 million for full service.

“It’s very difficult to do a step-by-step approach to rail,” McGraw said. “You’re either in it or you’re not.”

Board of directors

Representing the entities along the ASA rail district is a 20-member board that a representative from Round Rock will sit on if the city joins the district.

Williamson County Commissioner Lisa Birkman represents her county on the board. She said she is keeping an open mind about rail and that more public education is needed so that voters can decide if they feel rail is worth the price.

“I would want to put it in a bond election and let the voters vote on it before we, the county, commit to any capital costs,” Birkman said.

Travis County Commissioner Gerald Daugherty, who represents his county on the board, said he is still waiting to see numbers that show rail ridership would be high enough to warrant the millions of dollars required to begin service.

“Bottom line: How are we going to justify this expense unless we can really come up with realistic ridership numbers?” he said. “If we can’t find the cost-benefit for what something is, then I think we need to look harder.”

Though the idea of public transportation seems popular, Daugherty points out that few commuters actually commit to use it. With a vast majority of travelers still relying on highways, he believes creating a more comprehensive road system may be a more sensible investment.

“If you don’t have a comprehensive road system, public transit doesn’t even work very well,” Daugherty said.

Prohibitive cost is cited by many as rail’s biggest drawback, but Schulze said rail has its benefits as well.

Passenger rail has long been a major source of public transportation along the West Coast and in the Northeast. Schulze said the Dallas Area Rapid Transit rail system has also been a success and a model for how she would like the ASA rail line to run.

Capital Metro’s 32 miles of rail will allow for transfer points to the ASA line in two locations: McNeil Road and in downtown Austin. Riders will be able to transfer from Capital Metro’s line to the ASA’s at those points. At stations along both lines, shuttles and buses will take riders from stations to major employers, shopping centers and other popular destinations. Schulze said the idea is to create a smooth transition for riders, transferring between rail and bus with one ticket.

“We have to make it seamless so the traveling public doesn’t care who is operating the system. All they care about is getting from point A to point B and making their connections,” Schulze said. “That’s our goal, that we all work cooperatively to make sure that this works for everybody.”

The ASA district’s commuter trains would travel at speeds of up to 79 miles per hour, with trip times being equal to or less than traveling the same distance by car. And with traffic and weather not impeding service, no matter the time of day or season of the year, Schulze said rail sticks to a tight schedule.

The fast track

Originally, the rail district planned to reroute Union Pacific freight that runs along MoPac to new track to be constructed east of Austin with funds from the state, but the 2008 Legislature chose not to finance the relocation.

Despite the funding setback for the ASA, teaming up with Amtrak — which by law has access to all freight lines in the county — should keep things on schedule as the two work to find a way to share the right-of-way with UP.

At the earliest, rerouting will be delayed until the rail relocation fund is presented before the Legislature next year, but the cooperative feasibility study with Amtrak will identify what improvements are needed to start interim service. The ASA line will travel along the UP right-of-way north from San Antonio to Round Rock, where it would switch to the MoKan right-of-way. Four miles of new track would be built to reach Georgetown, and upgrades would be made along the line to improve safety.

Optional automobiles

If public transportation takes off across the state, Schulze said it might only be a matter of time before travelers could trade in their automobiles for bus and train passes.

“If you worked downtown, it would be a piece of cake — you wouldn’t need a car. If you were a student, it wouldn’t be a problem,” she said. “If people embraced developments around the station with living, working, shopping, then a car would be unnecessary.”

Those living in the suburbs may need a car to get from their house to a train line, but Schulze said the days of sitting in traffic on IH 35 may eventually be a thing of the past.Commuter vs. Light Rail

“I would love to see the day when having a car would be a choice and not something you have to do. We’re just not there yet.”

Off The Rails, On The Road

Round Rock will begin commuter and reverse-commuter service to tie into Capital Metro’s bus system this fall at the Tech Ridge Park and Ride. Though the city will not be paying the 1-cent sales tax required to join Capital Metro, transportation to Tech Ridge will give riders access to bus lines throughout Austin.

The bus service will be a two-year trial with a cost of approximately $500,000 a year, half of which would come from federal funds. The city is currently trying to get commuter feedback from travelers who may use the service about the routes offered and the times they will run.

If the project proves popular with commuters, the city could opt to continue it and may eventually upgrade to a fixed-route bus system as the population density grows. While the city will initially focus on transportation to and from major employers in Round Rock, routes to train stations would be considered when rail comes through, said David Bartels, Round Rock public works planning and programs administrator.

What about Pflugerville?

Pflugerville will not have a stop along the rail from San Antonio to Georgetown because none of the right-of-ways in the ASA district’s plans are within the city. But future expansions of Capital Metro’s rail from Leander to Austin may give Pflugerville access to the entire line through the abandoned MoKan right-of-way, which runs through downtown Pflugerville.

“It’s something that we’re looking at, as well as some of the other transportation entities in the area,” said Adam Shaivitz, spokesperson for Capital Metro.

feed13 Comments
Terry Ardoin
July 03, 2008
Votes: +8

I would like to see a rail stop in Round Rock. What is it that this growing city does not see as an acceptable travel destination/stop for this rail. I go to San Antonio often and this would add to my travel ease and cost savings. Do we need for the city/county to vote on this? My vote is in favor. Let's get it done.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
jw
July 04, 2008
Votes: +1

The MoKan right of way in pflugerville doesn't necessarily seem like the best option. What about something near 130 Toll? That might be a good fit. MoKan will be a mess since it cuts through a ton of neighborhoods.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
PT
July 04, 2008
Votes: -9

I am a Round Rock resident and have been for almost 15 years. We DO NOT need public transit here. 112 miles of rail from San Antonio to Georgetown for a mere 613 million. Ridiculous! And for what, so you can go visit your relatives in San Antonio every now and then? The ridership would mainly be people who don't have a vehicle of their own. Williamson County Commissioner Lisa Birkman has it right - let the citizens of Round Rock vote on it. Unfortunately there are people like ASA senior planner, Alison Schulze, who want to push the city of Round Rock into making a quick and rash decision because Round Rock "may be left without a station." Ms. Schulze said she would like to see the day when "having a car would be a choice and not something you have to do." Most of us see owning our own car as a wonderful freedom and privilege. Nobody views it as a negative. Lets keep ASA out of Round Rock. We don't need it, you can't justify it. We don't want to be like Austin - that's why the majority of us moved to Round Rock in the first place.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Victor in Round Rock
July 05, 2008
Votes: -8

Cool idea! Will it...
Get me to the bank (from my house) in 10 minutes? No
Get me to the post office (from my house) in 10 minutes? No
Get me to HEB (from my house) in 7 minutes? No
Get me to my dental appointment (from my house) in 20 minutes? No

Let me ask these questions a simpler way. Will it get me to the bank, post office, HEB, or the doctor AT ALL? No.

New York and other cities that have over one hundred skyscrapers downtown need public rail because they don't have enough parking for everyone. Austin and surrounding areas obviously don't have a clue as to why a city needs a public rail system.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Kenny
July 08, 2008
Votes: +6

As a regular commuter from Georgetown to San Antonio, I warmly welcome this project. This will significantly reduce both my commute time. Will it completely replace my need for a vehicle? No. Regardless, Austin is substantially behind most metropolitan areas of comparable size in terms of public transportation. Further, with projections of future population levels being as dramatic as they are, the time to move on this is NOW! Let's face it, the Austin metropolitan region needs to invest in public transportation not just for today, but to anticipate tomorrow's needs as well.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Andraya
July 08, 2008
Votes: +5

I'm RR resident since July 2005. I'm very dependable to use CARTS bus to work in daily but CARTS closed on weekend which is not fair. Public Transit should be helpful to have residents who don't have transportation in daily, Use them for going to school, shopping, dr's appointment, etc. Save $$$ instead of driving own vehicle because of gas price is getting higher. Think twice of residents who's on low-income, Section 8, etc. it is hard on them to get transportation.


report abuse
vote down
vote up
Ruth Cázares
July 09, 2008
Votes: +5

My vote goes without hesitation to Round Rock having a stop in the Austin (Georgetown) – San Antonio Rail. The city is up for significant growth with a campus (in progress) of Texas State University and future campuses for Texas A&M Medical School, and Austin Community College. The need for public transportation is a no-brainer at this point taking into account environmental, economic, and social factors. By using public transportation people help the environment by reducing water, soil and air pollution. The price of gasoline has become prohibitive and many of us welcome alternative means of transportation. People without a car, unable to drive, or just wanting to reduce their driving will have the opportunity to reach points in between as well as beginning to end points in this proposed route.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
M
July 09, 2008
Votes: +2

I would definately vote for the rail stop in Round Rock. I also hope that the steerers of the committee would seriously consider placing the station by the university and new hospital. The Mockingbird station in Dallas is a fabulous example of a successful rail stop, and I feel if it was replicated in Round Rock, we would see the money recouped in a short period of time.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Ankita
July 10, 2008
Votes: +1

I think this is a great idea! I know many people that have a commute to work of 1 hour each way, which is ridiculous! Having a train like this put in will be a great addition, many people will benefit from this. Just because a few house wives/moms don't have a reason to use the railway system doesn't mean the other majority won't need this to not only go to work, but to help the environment as well.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Paul Margolies
July 12, 2008
Votes: +2

I am a rail passenger supporter with NARP memberships in TX and nationally.

The article on "Round Rock considers stop on the Austin-San Antonio rail" is very timely and vital. For a progressive, rapidly growing city, it is unbelievable Round Rock would not take the initiative to be an important promoter.

The old "head in the sand" mentality that maybe just pouring more concrete for highways and "save money" is a longer term solution for the traffic grid lock is ludicrous. Just take a look at what other metropolitan have achieved with a rail alternative today.

Let me know if I can get involved to assist with this concept and pass on my memo to the appropriate people.

Thanks.

Paul Margolies
pmargo@sbcglobal.net
6 Bluff View
Round Rock, TX 78664

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Ernest M
July 14, 2008
Votes: +2

What's the point of *not* having a stop? They're building the rail anyway. Round Rock may as well benefit from it, even if some people are worried that it'll allow those dirty poor people to come set foot in RR.

Now, there do need to be better feeders to make it more useful. That's the problem with most of the Austin public transit now - the buses don't come to Round Rock; for a park and ride I have to drive 10 minutes; I may as well drive the full 20 and just get to work. Having secondary transport to UT, the hospitals, and other major points of interest would be valuable so it's not just use by "people in walking distance from the one stop."

Anyway, buyin now is $50k with no commitment - it's stupid not to get in and start some planning.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Brittany H.
July 30, 2008
Votes: +1

I'm a UT student living in Round Rock. Commuting to campus everyday for class gets to be quite a hassle. Because Round Rock STILL has no public transportation, I have to fight traffic to get from north Round Rock to the Pflugerville Park & Ride every morning to catch my bus. And despite all the objections to public transit that I'm hearing in Round Rock, a good many of the people using the Park & Ride seem to be coming from there as well. Even if the city does choose to continue to ignore the need for commuter rail, they will very soon have to face the reality of the need for some type of public transit as the city continues to grow rapidly.
And besides, if the rail is going through the city anyways, why not put a stop there and entice people to come visit (and spend some money)?

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Matthew Torres
October 21, 2008
Votes: +1

A commuter rail is good in theory. Part of the problem is that the stops aren't convenient for a lot of people. What I mean is that if the rail stops at Mopac and 5th street and you work on Congress and 8th street then are you expected to walk to your work area. That just doesn't work for everyone. And, a taxi isn't always an option for people on a budget.

I like public transportation because it gets cars off the road and it's probably a better solution for the environment.

What I'd like to see is ASA try to incorporate free bicycles within this project so people can ride a bike to and from the station.

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Write comment
 
  smaller | bigger
 

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
This Issue | Dec 2008
Past Issues
Business Profiles

Brain Express • Pflugerville

Business Profiles

The Thinking Cap • Round Rock

Nonprofit Profile

Elder Care

Community Corridor

Historic Downtown • Pflugerville

Inside Information

City Council News - November 2008 Meetings

Inside Information

Where to get Tamales

Guides

Area Volunteer Opportunities - December 2008

Guides

Holiday Shopping Guide - December 2008

Real Estate

State of the Central Texas commercial market

Real Estate

Commercial Real Estate - December 2008

Real Estate

Residential Property Listings — December 2008

Neighborhoods

Sonoma • Round Rock • 78665

Neighborhoods

Swenson Farms • Pflugerville • 78660